Alan Greene

There's currently no `displayName` support in the `PipelineRun` resource. There are both `displayName` and `description` fields on `Task` and `Pipeline` resources, but not on `PipelineRun`. See: - https://tekton.dev/docs/pipelines/tasks/#specifying-a-display-name - https://tekton.dev/docs/pipelines/tasks/#adding-a-description...

Closing as there's currently nothing for the Dashboard to do here. Feel free to propose a TEP as described above to add a display name or similar field to the...

@afrittoli should we also remove this considering the presubmit job was removed in https://github.com/tektoncd/plumbing/pull/2840/files#diff-43597815f705840f0d74fd38408b1dfab023521863d730099df2dad36f7183a5L395-L416? https://github.com/tektoncd/plumbing/blob/94a5d5c3db90db8420875c4957cb053da46e654a/prow/config.yaml#L788-L813

Do we want / need to keep the postsubmit go-coverage jobs?

I think I have a solution, just need time to test it fully. Hopefully later today 🤞

I have a working go coverage replacement using https://github.com/marketplace/actions/go-unit-test-coverage-report The skulls might be a bit much, but it's only for each 10% decrease so should be rare 😅 It uses...

PR for chains which is where I initially tested it (on my fork): https://github.com/tektoncd/chains/pull/1447 However chains appears to have problems with its tests unrelated to my changes. and for pipeline:...

All of the coverage jobs have been migrated to GHA workflows now and I've updated the checklist above to reflect the current status of the remaining jobs.

Related https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/pull/8768#issuecomment-3364765090 Using `paths-ignore` on the workflow may not be suitable

/retest