JuliusMartensen
JuliusMartensen
Hey! Nice work! I've discussed this topic briefly with Chris. This could definitely improve the consistency of the `DataDrivenResult`. The `DataDrivenProblem` on its own is model agnostic, the method brings...
Can confirm. The problem seems to originate from the defaults, since ```Julia @named model = compose(_model, mass, spring) ModelingToolkit.defaults(model) ``` Returns ```Julia Dict{Any, Any}(mass₊m => 1.0, mass₊pos[1](t) => [1.0, -1.0][i],...
Set to Phobos 1.1 . Right now, SMURF is not used by many users. Hence the problem can be pushed to our future selfs.
My current workflow w.r.t to this topic ( as of now ): - Checkout merge request - Export robot - Use python to merge the files for data like inertials,...
Pushed to 1.1 . Could be done via Principle Component Analysis of the point cloud.
Definitely, but as stated in #24, my main focus is getting ISInDy and other methods for ODE and DAE to run. But once this is done, I can tackle this.
If the embedding is given, than HAVOK might be also nice. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00030-8.pdf
Thanks! I am a little bit anxious because that would mean using the DataSet type :) But I will definitely have a look. Did you use them within DataDrivenDiffEq? Or...
Hi! That would be awesome! We had a brief discussion on this a long time ago in in #56 and #5 . For some hints - if you haven't already...
I think this could be done and add the `DiscreteSystem` support in the same PR. It should work out of the box right now, using the rhs of the equation,...