Adam Wójcik
> @Adam-it, Apologies for the delay! Will drop the PR tonight or tomorrow. No problem
Thank you for the update. I will for sure try to give it a check in the coming days 👍
this was already done https://pnp.github.io/blog/post/different-approaches-in-spfx-development/ Forgot to close this one 😅 Once again, awesome work @Sandeep-FED on this 👏👏
@milanholemans, @dojcsakj I totally agree. I think it would be a great improvement to show always all members of a group, so users and groups. I only wonder if we...
> In that case, shouldn't we move all `group user` commands to `group member`? @milanholemans but that would mean we need to add support for subgroups in the other commands...
> Yes, that would mean we have to add support for this to `entra group user set` and `entra group user add`. `entra group user remove` is still an open...
> Looks good to me. @milanholemans do you want to take the lead on the related `epic` or should I do that? @dojcsakj lets update the naming in your initial...
I'll take it
Thanks for another awesome PR 💪👍. You are on 🔥 also today. We will review it ASAP, but please be patient 🙏, I think the amount of open PRs supposed...
[setting to draft due to the following observations](https://github.com/pnp/cli-microsoft365/issues/4531#issuecomment-1722583117) I will provide more guidance how we should proceed with this PR in near future