OpenPBR icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
OpenPBR copied to clipboard

Specification and reference implementation for the OpenPBR Surface shading model

Results 70 OpenPBR issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

After some discussion internally (with @ZapAndersson), we feel that the emission controls would be improved if: - we add an `emission_weight` parameter in [0,1], that multiplies the luminance, defaulting to...

As discussed on [Slack](https://academysoftwarefdn.slack.com/archives/C06365EAQMP/p1721304580941849), the spec is currently inconsistent about the range of `specular_weight`. For dielectrics, we allow it to exceed 1, as a sort of convenience. For metals, we...

Then GitHub pages needs to be pointed to the new `/docs` folder.

1.1.1

On testing we noticed that if `specular_weight > 1` and the material is metallic, then there is energy gain, e.g.: | `specular_weight` 1 | `specular_weight` 6 | | ------------- |...

When metal is coated by a dielectric (or a thin film), its Fresnel factor will be modified due to the adjacent dielectric IOR differing from air. Modeling this in OpenPBR...

We describe in the spec a recommendation for implementing the roughening that a coat will generate in the underlying base lobes. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d77f2b89-3f9d-4141-b8c6-5ae43787921d) A similar effect should occur for _fuzz_ also...

Clearly a very minor detail, but the reference implementation has [Fuzz before Coat](https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/blob/main/reference/open_pbr_surface.mtlx#L50) while the specification has [Coat before Fuzz](https://academysoftwarefoundation.github.io/OpenPBR/#parameterreference) in the parameter reference.

The current way of repeating the `uifolder` string in the `uiname` makes for a very repetitive UI experience: ![image](https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/assets/56274617/61ca8e89-6422-4a3d-a6b4-18246cf11167) Suggestion: remove the UI folder prefix to get instead ![image](https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/assets/56274617/392b1954-20ad-4866-860d-beaa909a2f39)

Some minor changes are needed to improve the clarity of the wording (around the implementation of the coat details). I discovered these while using the spec myself to implement the...

Based on the interesting discussion in https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/issues/149, it seems worth adding this side note: ![image](https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenPBR/assets/2774364/b3bfe9cf-7820-4dd8-bc0f-45eb21268110)