Aaron Saam

Hi @mibaumgartner, Thank you for the quick reply! I went on a trip of debugging. The validation set indeed performs better, with more true positive values. We are currently visualizing...

Hi @mibaumgartner, Currently I am again training the nnDetection on the ADAM dataset, this time mapping the label for the treated aneurysm (value=2) to background (value=0), and using a patient...

Thank you for the reply! 1. The results_boxes.json contains a.o. the following values: ```AP_IoU_0.10_MaxDet_100```: ```0.835501827391805``` ```FROC_score_IoU_0.10```: ```0.8580705009276438``` 2. The plot of my run shows 154 "pos" instances. (TP: 145; FP:...

Hi @mibaumgartner , - The `pred_hist_IoU@0_1.png` plot is lower in TP compared to the original run (video on the ADAM website); there are also more 'confident' FP values visible: ...

Hi @mibaumgartner, Thanks for the results! I agree that the validation seems fine, which makes the disappointing results thus the more interesting. I double checked (say triple checked) the testing...

Quick update: Following the ADAM evaluation method, the best model checkpoint predictions give a sensitivity of `0.63` and a FPcount of `0.32`. I uploaded the loss curves for the five...