Aaron Robinson

> I was hoping that RegisterForMarshalling can be capable enough to supply the COM interop wrappers for common scenarios like WinForms, without changing the calling code. What information do you...

@kant2002 That is typically what that means. However, I don't know why that would be occurring in your scenario. What version of .NET are you using?

@kant2002 Okay. I see what is going on here. Yes, we always pass that when a call is triggered through the built-in `Marshal` APIs. This can be ignored if you...

The code in question - recently updated in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/35681 - can be viewed [here](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/30c0d0ac33ad0e7abd54f209c082636e8e59b78c/src/coreclr/src/vm/interoplibinterface.cpp#L1418-L1453).

@kant2002 Along with @jkotas's suggestion, it would be useful to see your vtable layouts - just as a sanity check.

@wasabii Thanks for tagging me. Points for cleverness as well earned. I do like the notion of creating "mostly compiled" content to reduce set up costs, but honestly it isn't...

@Joshquinberoani and @VS-ux I will link to a reply I made in the C#/WinRT repo. I want to make sure expectations are understood about the API in question - it...

/cc @JeremyKuhne

Sad. I'm going to disable this test now. I'm very confused as to why this is occurring.

I will take a look at this.