Aaron Robinson

@YairHalberstadt I personally have no objections to that, but it would be up to the language teams to make the final decision. I would imagine some complexity if that wasn't...

>Previous discussion: #753 @alrz That is definitely being discussed here. Should we close that issue in lieu of this one since this is a super-set?

> > How does documentation for Foo work? > > The generated Foo includes its documentation. That documentation flows along the same way as nodemal code. The auto-generated code isn't...

>In other words, the thing you're trying to fix/avoid here is precisely the use model we're trying heavily to move toward. the expectation is absolutely to not have the definitions...

>We don't need any sort of language handshakes to invent. It's all just an api. This isn't a requirement for sure. This simply makes the Source Generator feature usable in...

@jamsoft Please let me know if you are still blocked. I don't think there is anything left on the DNNE side of things to address here.

@roboz0r That is a great solution. Thank you for sharing. If you have an example project to share that would be most helpful.

@GF-Huang I believe the issue is the enclosing class, `InnoSetupHelper`, must also be marked `partial`.

> Why the example no partial? A mistake - I've updated the example above. This specific github issue isn't really an official venue for docs and details. I would focus...

>@AaronRobinsonMSFT I believe that we have talked about having extra arguments for CreateObject that may make this better, but I am not sure where we landed on it. I don't...