A35K
A35K
> This is clearly an error in the OSM data because here the separately mapped cycleway should be part of the relation and not the tertiary way. I see what...
> [@A35K-K](https://github.com/A35K-K) When you edit the data I suggest to remove the `class:bicycle ` from both ways: We shouldn't need this to get the routing right. @ratrun The tag is...
> Fixed it. You can simply select select the way segment and add it to existing relations by typing the relation name: @otbutz Well now the route is broken as...
Just like Lumikeiju I also support this request, it would be incredibly useful for Rapid