Daniel Kahlenberg

> > > I haven't tested Crate2nix, but I believe the main advantage of Carnix over it is the name. AFAIC, the design is much better and less hacky. Also,...

@P-E-Meunier there is even a logo idea in my head, what about the rust crab with nix's lambdas as scissors cartoon-style (hence car2... as in two or to ...nix).

Using [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/download.html) it was as easy as: `nix-shell '' -p wxGTK31` And following the README's instructions for compiling on Linux.

I have no experience with the process so if someone else is willing to do this [this](https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/7134) might be a good template.

@jonascarpay with the config in my home-manager config as you have in https://github.com/jonascarpay/nix/blob/3840e6c20ff46e173600057eb490f8005f0787a7/home.nix (using `caches.cachix` instead of `cachix`) I get: > Existing file '/home/573/.config/nix/nix.conf' is in the way Please move...

@jonascarpay basically OK for me. If I have additional entries in nix.conf, i. e. extra-platforms = ..., substituters = ..., trusted-public-keys = ..., builders-use-substitutes = ..., builders = ... I...

@jonascarpay fine with me.

With chrome getting: >current $ scoop install [email protected] WARN Given version (73.0.3683.68) does not match manifest (74.0.3729.131) WARN Attempting to generate manifest for 'chrome' (73.0.3683.68) Autoupdating chrome DEBUG[1557912977] $substitutions (hashtable)...

@janpio, it seems just like the checksum ($match32 part) is missing there as well as @r15ch13 pointed out already. Does it make sense as a workaround to factor these out...

I have a workaround described [here](https://gist.github.com/573/e806447bf55a09376cf457a8a403ec44) until the match-issue is sorted out. Applies to chrome only.