Denis Rouzaud
Denis Rouzaud
@wonder-sk @troopa81 @nyalldawson @rouault do you have an opinion on this approach?
This is the one https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/58663
yes, this can (and should) be switched. Define a setting with a dynamic parameter (see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/a8dc05be67d880ad609a3b80d13447f2dd421874/src/core/providers/ogr/qgsogrdbconnection.cpp#L20) I would be in favor of creating a new tree node for this, we...
indeed, interesting. We could maybe play here https://github.com/opengisch/qgis-plugin-ci/blob/e48f4b8e609e2e8ffeded273cb5e43d8ba93f3c4/qgispluginci/release.py#L425 to create a link to the raw file in Github repo?
@elpaso Nyall has moved sipify from Perl to Python, there might some remaining issues. Regarding the map files, no need to update them from the PR.
if possible I would be in favor of backporting to 3.34 to make our life easier, keep everything synchronised and bring the cool new stuff to all pyqgis docs.
better handling of booleans? use store_true/store_false (similar to python)
scripts from https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tree/master/.docker/qgis_resources/test_runner should be copied and adapted
Yes that would be great to integrate them here if that helps at testing plugins.
plugin manually published here https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgepplugin/#plugin-versions