Julian Verdurmen

@kaylumah could you please test with Reqnroll.xunit.v3.3.0.0-ci20250804-1446.nupkg Artifact packages-v3.0.0-ci20250804-1446 Artifact download URL: https://github.com/reqnroll/Reqnroll/actions/runs/16735781647/artifacts/3686120693

@kaylumah could you please test if `@ignore` also works? (see https://docs.reqnroll.net/latest/execution/test-results.html#ignored-tests) I will also try to find time to try the xunit v3 package this week

I'm working on the build fail (caused by https://github.com/reqnroll/Reqnroll/pull/706) update: fixed

FYI, fixed the conflict in the changelog, but not actively working on this PR

The build is broken, not sure if I did that or that's a result of another PR > Reqnroll.xUnit.ReqnrollPlugin -> /home/runner/work/Reqnroll/Reqnroll/Plugins/Reqnroll.xUnit.ReqnrollPlugin/bin/Debug/netstandard2.0/Reqnroll.xUnit.ReqnrollPlugin.dll /home/runner/work/Reqnroll/Reqnroll/Plugins/Reqnroll.xUnit3.ReqnrollPlugin/XUnit3RuntimeProvider.cs(8,38): error CS0535: 'XUnit3RuntimeProvider' does not implement interface member...

> You can just implement with returning null for now. I think I could use the implementation of xUnit 2 also, as the SkipException is also there in xUnit 3...

@chekkan could you help us in getting the last things resolved? See open PR comments

I guess this will be 3.1? As bug fixes has more prio then this one? Update, it see it was the plan for 3.x already, see https://reqnroll.net/news/2025/06/roadmap-update-html-report/

Great stuff! _I haven't checked the code, but only read the pull request description_ One small note: > - StepMethodMustReturnVoidOrTaskAnalyzer: ensures a step method must return Task or void -...

> I based this off the constraints in our documentation. If ValueTask is supported, the documentation should probably be updated to reflect that See https://docs.reqnroll.net/latest/guides/migrating-from-specflow.html > Features ... Support for...