Márton Polgár

Hello, thanks for the quick feedback. To be honest, I can't say I feel there were convincing points made. > In terms of "3 < 5 min 1" giving 1,...

Hello, even if there is no conclusion, I'm happy that "we are working"; I think that thinking about these things is always beneficial some ways. Also... I think I have...

Hi @raiph , I hope you to engage with some of my points because this doesn't seem particularly useful or related to anything. I said that I wanted to get...

I don't think you should act as if it was impossible to add something meaningful to the discussion - and if your best idea was to nitpick about my example...

Well, I actually wanted to also react to @codesections 's message that I only saw afterwards but that opportunity came much later apparently... By the way, certain things don't depend...

This still sounds rather cryptic. On the other hand, I have a very simple question: what makes all other operators, **with special regards to `gcd` and `lcm`**, suited for Numeric...

For the old design documents: I also followed the trace based on what I could understand from your remarks. The blog belongs to Solomon Foster - he was the one...

How is it misleading? And an even better question would be: what does it mean that certain operators "`filter` their operands"? One thing is sure: neither `eq`, nor `==` fail...

**Bonus issue(?)** `all(1,4) &infix: 4` might look like something that should do the same as `all(1,4) != 4` - what it actually does is more than surprising: it parses as...

> I know this is not the point of the issue, but it's probably better to use so none(1,3) == 3. Yes, I realized it somewhere on the way and...