2b0b08b5-5063-438f-950b-688da3ca9920 comments

Results 7 comments of


                                            2b0b08b5-5063-438f-950b-688da3ca9920

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

I don't think it is necessary to allow to customize the chunk size. Indeed Python should provide a good value by default that works for all platforms.

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

Will it not be better indeed to just stream.read() without any argument? Because HTTPResponse will call \_safe_read with just the length of the header.

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

Answering to myself, it is better to read by chunk to feed the parser also by chunk. So here is a version of the patch which increases by 2 on...

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

ping

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

Is there an infrastructure already in place for such microbenchmark?

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

Here is the client/server scripts. I don't measure a big performance improvement with it. I think the improvement measured in [msg257756](https://bugs.python.org/msg257756) are linked to the way xmlrpclib is overriden in...

Poor performance when reading large xmlrpc data

One advantage, I see, is when xmlrpclib is overridden to use an other marshaller which is can not be feed chunk by chunk. So reducing the number of call to...