David du Colombier
David du Colombier
I've added the documentation.
Thanks. I've added this change to 9legacy. http://9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/9k-jmk-uarti8250-noexists.diff
I'll take a look. The bug predates the rewrite of the dpkg probe, so thankfully, it's not a regression.
I believe handling of virtual package could be implemented by parsing the `Provides` field of `/var/lib/dpkg/status`. I should be able to work on this in the next few weeks.
I'm proposing this change: https://github.com/OpenSCAP/openscap/pull/2255 This is currently a work-in-progress. For now, I've kept the version of the actually installed package, but I think we can let the field empty...
I've successfully ran the CSPM Host Benchmarks non-regression tests.
I'm always happy when linking statically.