Vyas Ramasubramani
Vyas Ramasubramani
We should revisit this PR after ~#188~ #332 is merged, it is pretty close to complete. As discussed with @csadorf, it might be beneficial to get this reviewed by someone...
Correct, this is no longer blocked. However, at this point I think we should plan this as a 2.1 feature so that we can focus our immediate efforts on finishing...
Sorry for not getting back to this any sooner. I think this is still more appropriate for 2.1. We have enough to get done to get us to a clean...
This is for 2.0.
> > Do we continue doing that and simply rename the package to `_synced_collection` > > Yes. We will expose the `BufferedJSONAttrDict` class from that package in the public API,...
Resolved in #807.
@glotzerlab/signac-committers should we revisit this going into signac 2.0? It would be possible to change this now, does anyone see any downsides?
The only change I would make to the above instructions is that we'll want to branch off of `schema2`, not `next` (or wait for `schema2` to be merged into `next`)....
Resolved by #808.
Addressing this issue thoroughly requires quite a bit of additional work. For the moment I'm bumping this feature past the 2.0 milestone. I'm (possibly ambitiously) targeting #189 for version 2.0,...