Vissarion Fisikopoulos

cmake provides a much simpler way to do this (see https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/pull/1302) so I am closing this PR

If you define a ring as non closed and then you omit the repeated point it is a valid geometry. If you define a ring as closed and then you...

The correct case is the second case you mentioned. A non closed ring is not a linestring.

> This should work indeed. But why don't we initialize it where the variable is declared (the C++11 way)? You are right, I was following the old style of the...

Indeed if the user set `dingo_model.parameters['fast_computations'] = False` then there is no error. However, if the user sets `dingo_model.set_slow_mode` then the issue persist. A side problem here is that the...

@ai-naymul thanks for this PR. I think it is better if we add that file inside `doc` maybe in a directory called `docker` or something that will contain that file...

I think it is better to do it in this PR. Do you confirm that the docker file you wrote works? What are the commands such that we can reproduce...

Also there is non gurobi rounding version. And this exposes a deeper issue: the slow_* and fast_* function design where there is a lot of duplicate code and they are...

@rorviksam thanks for the report. It seems that the problem is the redundant point that represents the pole (note that both points (163 -90) and (75 -90) represent the same...

@rorviksam But they are the same point i.e. the South pole, actually all points $(x,-90)$, where $x\in (-180,180]$ represent the same point, the South pole. In other words if the...