Vissarion Fisikopoulos

I agree this is a interesting non-trivial feature. I would be interested to work on it but I cannot promise timelines. Also I do not know if other libraries support...

> Say you have a bunch of polygons which all seem valid by your definition - if you union them they might create a polygon which violates the definition of...

sorry for the late reply, sure, I can help!

sorry for the slow replies here... I think it make sense to start with some simple algorithm like area since the whole project seems complicated (i.e. to provide full support...

@LongPham7 thanks for opening this issue and your example. We use to support low dimensional polytopes but this is dropped in https://github.com/GeomScale/volesti/pull/194 (see the files with names "get_full_dimensional_polytope") because the...

Similar issue (feature request) https://github.com/GeomScale/volesti/issues/246

@NehaAr I moved this here since it is a different issue. Please add input in plain text to let others reproduce the issue. Also this could be helpful https://medium.com/nyc-planning-digital/writing-a-proper-github-issue-97427d62a20f

@NehaAr the contents in the first screenshot are unclear and in the second screenshot a random Vpolytope is generated. So I do not understand how the data from issue https://github.com/GeomScale/volesti/issues/236...

Could you try generating the CRAN package and try to install it? What happens if you try to install the CRAN from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/volesti/index.html See also https://github.com/GeomScale/volesti/issues/271#issuecomment-1475816023

It is not clear that the issue is general and not an issue of your environment, since the package is building correctly in several windows platforms (see github actions and...