Volker Gropp

Hi, what is the status of this issue? As i experience slow performance using pack200 with latest head

just a wild guess without currently being able to check it, -D need #ifdef HAVE_FORK, is it enabled in your config.h? There should be flushing using fflush (https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=fflush&sektion=3&apropos=0&manpath=freebsd), are other...

I welcome PR especially for non linux systems.

Hi, can you create a github Pull Request? Merging would be easier that way. https://gist.github.com/Chaser324/ce0505fbed06b947d962

ok, ill look into the patches later

not yet, but its on my todo list

hi, sorry for the long delay, i included the devstat device number fix and change the fflush() a bit to not use in when printing the header but always flush...

first thoughts: - what about changes - ipv4 vs ipv6 layout - what about multiple addresses - physical vs software/logical view

to specify an alternative would be very useful as we could use the git timestamp for a somewhat reproducible build. As far as i can tell, pack does already supports...

As i ran into this issue with the path relative to the outfile and not to the source.py, maybe include a small hint into the documentation?