Vincent Demeester

> > shall we also this to all deployments created by operator? if the deployment doesn't have it.. > > I tested and checked, and it is happening for all...

@piyush-garg interesting, it doesn't look like "root" label work with the command... maybe we could have a `triage` one ? 🤔 /triage grooming

/triage wg-discuss This one seems to exist 🤔

/project "Tekton Operator working group"

@piyush-garg what is the status here ?

/lgtm

@Obirah probably a naive question : would it work to use `kustomize` for this ? (aka replacing the set of image with an overlay or something)

@fgiloux 🤔 I think the image used by the operator (upstream) with the OpenShift target is `ubi8` (see https://github.com/tektoncd/operator/blob/main/.ko.yaml). This is indeed not the case for the "downstream" operator, aka...

Note: if upstream OpenShift release such as [here](https://github.com/tektoncd/operator/releases/tag/v0.54.0) are using RHEL, then this should be considered as a bug.

Ah it's only for few images, such as the `buildah` image, I see. Then I tend to agree. I've checked, all of the component and operator images are based on...