Ufuk Turunçoğlu

@DeniseWorthen I think this PR aims to fix those issues and update ESCOMP. Right? I was also looking to this but maybe you already done it. Let me know if...

@DeniseWorthen Okay. It seems that it is removed with other PR. Right? @jedwards4b Do you know why? Was it creating issue with CESM?

@DeniseWorthen @jedwards4b As I remember we are testing all the PR with CESM.

@mvertens @jedwards4b If you think that this is still issue just let me know and I could change the status of this PR. Otherwise we could close this.

@mvertens What do you think about the changes in the masking? It is working in my case but not sure how affects other CESM configurations. I could not be sure...

@mvertens @jedwards4b we think that the fill type could be controlled via nuopc.runconfig or nems.configure but we could make the default as nstod and the existing applications such as CESM...

@danrosen25 @mvertens @jedwards4b this is fixed by introducing name of the model component. So, it looks like following now. ``` else if (trim(coupling_mode) == 'hafs') then dstMaskValue = ispval_mask srcMaskValue...

@samsrabin I think this is possible with exiting implementation. See following entry, ``` taxmode02: cycle mapalgo02: consd tInterpAlgo02: lower readMode02: single dtlimit02: 1.5 stream_offset02: 0 yearFirst02: 2022 yearLast02: 2022 yearAlign02:...

Of course, the data file still need to have time axis to support this. CDEPS always requires it to read data. I am not sure if we could make those...

@mansurjisan Thanks. Yes. I did the same thing but I am not sure it is a good practice to use conda and pip together. It is not a big deal...