message-format-wg
message-format-wg copied to clipboard
Developing a standard for localizable message strings
See [this comment of mine](https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/728#discussion_r1784723483) in #728
It would probably be a good idea for us to be conformant with both [UAX #31](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/) and [UTS #55](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr55/). We're already in #673 and the [bidi-usability design doc](https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/blob/main/exploration/bidi-usability.md) working on...
This is to build up and capture technical considerations for how to address the issues raised by @eemeli's PR #842.
In response to merging #884 and the proposal in the bidi-usability design document, we agreed in the 2024-09-16 call to add an "optionally normative" section of the spec in the...
The default registry still lists "field options" as being valid configuration for MF2. https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/blob/main/exploration/default-registry-and-mf1-compatibility.md#field-options As an implementer, I am troubled by this requirement creeping into MF2. It is well established...
During the last call I gave some feedback that I found it confusing that `:function`s are used in two (or maybe three) somewhat distinct ways, without any obvious syntax difference....
There has been an issue open for a few months about starting a study in TC39-TG5 focused on what shape of Intl.MessageFormat would be most helpful for developers on the...
Similar to #805, we also agreed that we wanted to collect feedback from the ICU-TC on MF2. Similar to #782, we might also want to ask ICU4X-TC for feedback as...
CLDR test data for MessageFormat 2 at https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/tree/main/common/testData/messageFormat We need to decide when to update this material. When we do, we should bookmark the existing tests as `LDML45`. We shouldn't...
This is from https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/wiki/Things-That-Need-Doing . I didn't see an existing issue for it. Full test coverage is probably impossible given the size of the grammar. But there are a couple...