Uday

Hi Team, @Ein-Tim @usama-openai Thanks in advance for your time and consideration. I look forward to your feedback and advice.

> Would this `eval` task be better trained as `[eval] Identify historical human made writing, citation, or quote`? It's only a matter of time between an AI generating text and...

Hi @RogerThiede, Thank you for your thought-provoking response! You've certainly given me a lot to think about. I concur with your observation that as time progresses, the distinction between human-authored...

Hi @luqman-openai I've referred to [documentation](https://github.com/openai/evals/blob/main/docs/build-eval.md#registering-the-eval) and modified the YAML file to ensure that it's registered properly. I was able to run it on my system and got the following...

Hi @luqman-openai, I was working on another eval (`identify_historical_text`) and I accidentally submitted a pull request. It aims to identify Historical Human-Made Writing, Citation, or Quote. I'm not sure if...

> @udaykumar1997 kindly create a separate PR for `identify_historical_text` eval and remove the related files from this PR. We don't recommend multiple eval's in the same PR. Hi @luqman-openai, thanks...

> Thanks for the updates. The eval looks interesting. I am approving this PR. > > You should see GPT-4 API access enabled in your account in the few days....

@RogerThiede and @luqman-openai thanks for your support and valuable insights. Incorporating your feedback into this `eval` will enable us to tackle the problem in a more efficient and sustainable manner....

Dear @luqman-openai and @RogerThiede, Thank you for your insightful comments and suggestions. I understand the limitations you pointed out regarding the initial evaluation setup and appreciate the constructive feedback. As...

Dear @RogerThiede, I have addressed your concerns and suggestions. > An `eval` of only positive evaluations trains a model to simply evaluate this specific system role as always being true....