Bevan Arps

I don't see the value-add of this - it lessens the ability of readers to reason about the C# source code their reading by adding mystery.

My inner pedant wants to come out and play ... ``` var hasEmployees = context.Employees.Where(x => x.CompanyID == companyID).Any(); ``` _"wooh, that's so verbose". You can write:_ ``` var hasEmployees...

Are _required_ and _initializable_ properties being considered as orthogonal concepts? Or is _required_ an extra that may only be applied to _initializable_ properties? I'd like to be able to write...

> Why not? Wrong question. Language features are tremendously expensive. The question needs to be _Why?_ And it needs a compelling answer, far more than _Why not?_

> Less typing accomplishes more (and thus less reading too). The two aren't strongly correlated. Shorter means more opportunity for confusion (does the code you're reading do what you think...

There's nothing particularly special about `Func` and `Action` - all delegate types are **sealed**. But you can define your own: ``` // Func public delegate T Eagle(Rect r, Vector2Int v,...

It's a priority for our `beta.4` release, which should be coming soon. We don't have an exact date for that, however. As noted above, this is blocked behind #2323 which...

Verified as fixed in #2323

Resolving as fixed. In the current Swagger WIP branch (see #2323), `BackupPolicy` is correctly turned into a union type as we want. In `api\documentdb\v1beta20210515\database_account_types_gen.go` we have: ``` go type BackupPolicy...

Type names are significantly improved by #2323 so I'm closing this.