David E. Wheeler

What does it mean to be `authorized`?

I can't do it; it's not my module.

Also, what would prevent this from happening again with some other module? This can't be the only one with this issue. How does search.cpan.org decide which to think is the...

Removing ENNO as co-maint might a PITA, because it's not just XML::RegExp that's a problem. See [all these modules](http://search.cpan.org/dist/libxml-enno/) which have since been moved to other distributions. Here's an example:...

Who here can make those changes to CPAN described in @mickeyn's #2? @oalders?

Yay, my RPM builder finally went back to normal! I went through the [libxml-enno module list](http://search.cpan.org/dist/libxml-enno/) and found there are still two where MetaCPAN incorrectly points to libxml-enno: * [XML::UM](https://fastapi.metacpan.org/v1/module/XML::UM)...

For any given module, the API should always return the latest distribution release containing the highest version of that module (with unversioned modules defaulting to v0), from an approved maintainer...

Is there something we can do in the short term to fix the invalid value reported in #614?

FWIW, the v0 API does not have this bug: * [v0 XML::RegExp](https://api.metacpan.org/v0/module/XML::RegExp) correctly has `"distribution" : "XML-RegExp",` * [v0 ExtUtils::Depends](https://api.metacpan.org/v0/module/ExtUtils::Depends) correctly has `"distribution" : "ExtUtils-Depends",` (see #614) So I'll just...

Bah, I see that the v0 API is not up-to-date. 😖