Andrew Tatomyr

If you remove the oneOf inside Dog, it starts working. On one hand, it's redundant, and removing it even makes the documentation a bit more readable. On the other hand,...

Hi @bojanz! I'm not sure it's a bug as the decorator removes exactly what you've told it to remove. Technically, `x-internal` could be placed on any node, so it'd be...

I’d like to add one, but I don’t have the bandwidth at the moment. If you'd like, you can try adding the decorator yourself here, or contribute to our [Cookbook](https://github.com/Redocly/redocly-cli-cookbook).

Hi @thecork3004, this is a Redoc issue. Will transfer it to the correct repo.

Redocly CLI correctly resolves the config. It looks like that's related to Redoc itself. Transferring there.

Could you update the PR? We've recently removed the StyleguideConfig at all.

I vote for the top-level, but I don't like naming like `openapi-30`... Maybe `openapi-3-0` will work better?

@RomanHotsiy It looks much nicer with dots. The only issue is that I vaguely remember we had some problems with parsing `features.openapi`. Or am I wrong?

> Will we refactor this throughout the code, or as an alias for parsing the config in? For me, it doesn't make much sense to refactor it deeply, especially taking...

> I propose a different format which would rely on the verbose syntax of each rule: Then there will be no way to configure different severity levels for different specifications....