Henrik Leijon
Henrik Leijon
This was the only use case I had so I haven't really looked. I'm sure there are some where one would expect a None-result rather than an exception, e.g for...
Looks like a reasonable fix. Thanks!
I thought about that as well, that's why I hinted at perhaps "hiding" or "blocking" the `Image()` constructor. I believe (but am not 100% certain and have not tested) that...
Then I misremembered. Thanks for checking. I will use `Image.new()`, but will still consider it odd that an object created with the default constructor is not comparable. :)
Yes, that would make the most sense.