Sameer Wagh

It is indeed puzzling, it shouldn't be the case. Are you running them on the same machine/set of machines? Are the parallelism parameters such as [this](https://github.com/snwagh/falcon-public/blob/master/src/globals.h#L27) the same across the...

`no_cores` manually parallelizes the bottleneck part of the code. I haven't found an automated way to find the appropriate number of cores but usually little less than half the machine...

No worries, feel free to create issues if you are unable to resolve it. It is a little hard to know what exactly might be causing the issue without taking...

I ran your above codes on localhost and could reproduce a similar error, the SecureNN timings are indeed a bit lower. The reason is unclear to me. :( I tired...

The functions are meant to work on fixed point values (thus integers only). It is hard to say what is causing the issue but if you might be printing the...

@ZJG0 Are you also having the same issue? I am not very sure how to debug this issue. Maybe there's another library out there that implements both protocols that could...

Apologies for the delay, have been on time off. This is somewhat expected as you might be reaching the precision limit. With 64-bit data type, you have about 32 bits...

Yes, the IPs are in order so the first one should be the IP of PC0, second one PC1 and so on. You should be able to run it over...

## Notes about the failing tests - `10-container-images.ipynb`. So when I run the following commands: ``` cd packages/ docker build -f grid/backend/backend.dockerfile . -t backend:0.1 docker run -d -e SINGLE_CONTAINER_MODE=true...

@lcy5201314 There does seem to be some issue based on your output. Party B having all zeros is fine but the `.first` and `.second` of the first and third party...