Gauthier Segay

@eiriktsarpalis: ``` csharp public interface ICloudServiceConfigurationMaker{ string BuildConfiguration(); } ``` and if None is passed, we use the original function (like I'm doing now with `Default`)? What if I'm doing...

Note that all optional parameters are using FSharpOption which currently is not too C# friendly neither (without additional helpers).

@isaacabraham I'm proposing, unless we have a clear idea of alternative, we make a very rough extension point for now; maybe I should define a DU with those two cases...

Updating my code and made PR #156, please let me know if this sounds like something we can integrate?

I'm wondering if, for sake of this getting reviewed in detail, there isn't a pro in having a compatibility module under the Chessie namespace. We would still make sure new...

@Thorium thanks, this looks very encouraging, I didn't had chance to try it out yet. I tried to reach out to you on fsharp slack, in order to plan synchronous...

It is not because Microsoft is doing something stupid that I'll do the same. I'm fine with releasing a separate nuget package, with precompiler flags that keeps the same codebase....

This is why supporting both overload, for million $$$ codebases that are very legacy (not specific to FSharp.Data.SqlClient, but vanilla ADO.NET), those codebase will always face challenge in terms of...

I'm giving a look at the issues, starting with UDTT handling, without usage of the type provider. ```fsharp #r "nuget: Microsoft.SqlServer.Server" #r "nuget: Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" open Microsoft.Data.SqlClient let connectionString = @"Data...

The **null propagation** operator (why give it a fancy name?) is one of those things which makes me wonder about choices made in C#. I see it as "help you...