Sascha Grunert

@Verolop let's fill out the template to close this one out please :)

> @kubernetes/release-managers Do we still need specific tests for this ? I would say so, yes. The question is where do we draw the baseline? We could define a minimum...

> Equivalent master-blocking prowjobs (mostly conformance and build) running on `aarch64` hardware as a starter ? Yes this sounds like a great start!

@mkumatag we have to follow the procedure outlined in https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/blob/master/release-blocking-jobs.md#promoting-or-demoting-jobs to promote a job :)

Let's hold on this for our ongoing discussion in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QnT2LJ1dNYFyvOCt_X6F8ry0KgAg8H2MjoZnt5Xgtog/edit?tab=t.0

@kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools-maintainers PTAL

@kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools-maintainers PTAL

+1 let’s get this project in shape for that.

> My proposal for OCI runtime spec was rejected before Do you have a reference to that? So are we happy to move forward with the CNCF?

> Apparently it needs to be moved to an independent org. [containers/youki#2962](https://github.com/containers/youki/issues/2962) Alright, which one would you prefer or suggest?