Saihajpreet Singh

so we use that package to run the `matchstick` binary but maybe there is a better way to do this https://github.com/graphprotocol/graph-tooling/blob/3860fb58190aad708a754a0338b1c37475943e25/packages/cli/src/commands/test.ts#L133-L173 happy for any PRs that improve this. We are...

I think this is a bug in `graph test` handling things cc @dimitrovmaksim. I just deployed the subgraph https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmSViNCkXNFbCNxASvWQ7TA694i5bufi4ncf2QxSVNA1Ga and it seems to work 

probably some type issue 🤔 ideas @azf20 @incrypto32

I think this is also important given we are going to be publishing this as binary soon #1257

can you give an example @sebastiantf?

> Is there a way to validate the schema to make sure its supported by graph-node during the build? Yeah I think there are some things we can do in...

good catch will work on cleaning these up!

actually i realized that we use `prettier` to format the generated code 🤔 which I think we should just remove and users can run prettier on their own as an...

not currently possible but 🔜 cc @azf20

@Menniti that will not be possible right now