Rod

For example, this would have detected https://github.com/googlefonts/fontations/pull/740

Thinking "aloud" we could probably rig a program to identify interesting glyph characteristics and try to find glyphs in the GF collection that are diverse?

"on count fields with single referent" remind me why only fields with a single referent? Does this mean if a num_blah is the count of two arrays we shouldn't do...

I just hit this on https://github.com/googlefonts/fontations/pull/304. _At least_ cpal appears to be missing annotations for this as well. I think we need to make codegen fail or infer the right...

Update https://github.com/googlefonts/use-skrifa after.

Thinking "aloud," if we didn't have traverse I wouldn't implement it just to get Debug. Perhaps that points to ripping it out?

I both agree with ^ and feel that we have bigger fish to fry. WDYT about removing traversal, adding simple debugs, and moving on to higher priority tasks?

cargo vet, #225, would also work.

Analysis much appreciated. QQ, what was overlapping refs meant to link to? - currently it takes me back here.

Low priority IMHO, unless ... would one need the traversal bits to walk the COLR graph? Or would the recommended approach be to just code that directly?