Rich Lander

Agreed. It's trivial to do. We just need to decide what scope to take on initially. Certainly, I can see your scenario. Let's say we did that. Would you move...

+100 Soft RID-specific dependencies would be awesome. Like, if I'm doing `win-x64`, I don't download `linux-x64` dependent packages. For clarity, the following packages doesn't use that feature, right? https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Microsoft.NETCoreApp.Runtime https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime...

There are at least three topics here (some which are overlapping): - What to do with the EOL runtime packages. The deprecate feature doesn't make obvious sense because they are...

I'm still playing with the idea of switching to RID-specific apps by default (for .NET 8): https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/23540. It occurs to me that if we made that change, that enabling restore...

Some commentary on the format, partially based on tips from Matt. - [Using RIDs](https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes/6.0/runtime-deps.json#L192) is probably not the best approach. - We don't intend long-term to have RIDs for all...

Can you share the commands you have in your Dockerfile?

That looks like a .NET Framework dialog. It looks like this app. https://github.com/mburbea/koar-item-editor/releases/tag/v2.1.189. I'll find a machine without .NET Framework 4.8 to test this.

I just built your branch. Took like

OK. I see now. When no runtime is installed at all, you get that screen you displayed above. I understand why. There isn't much logic in the apphost. It's all...

@elinor-fung -- should this specific case be resolved now?