Rich Lander

In that case, we'd have the version of the host, like we do in the "no .net" apphost case. Right?

I think it would make sense to pass the info and then we can figure out the right policy on the server side later. Keep our options open.

That's be sweet! Yes, there is a known format. Here's is one of the links: https://aka.ms/dotnet-core-applaunch?framework=Microsoft.AspNetCore.App&framework_version=7.0.0-preview.4.22251.1&arch=x64&rid=win10-x64 We'd probably want to create a different one for this scenario so we know...

Let's decide what we want to do and then I'll make both links at the same time.

I updated the document to make it clear when you are intended to use of the "scenarios". https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/7699

For sure. I'm glad the instructions helped. > install the SDK without an extra sources Indeed. This is the plan going forward.

Can you change the name of the ENV? It is pretty non-standard. Also, long ENVs are fine. `ENABLE_P_RELEASE_SLN` -> `DOTNET_PUBLISH_RELEASE_SLN`

You can already put `Configuration` in .csproj, right? I would assume this is similar.

I cannot comment on the dates. Only @marcpopMSFT can.

We're going to take another (and hopefully final) run at resolving this for .NET 6.0.