Carl A. B. Pearson

> > I think that makes this PR a no-go > > I was a bit surprised to see breakage. Which went away in the main branch. I haven't time...

Can do a PR for just converting macros => functions, sure. Then maybe draft something for one of the others, and see how it looks w/o (initially) super polishing it?...

Porting discussion from closed PRs #215 / #218 here: - any overhead reductions in digest need maintain code readability - better approach may be to introduce no-frills functionality What could...

Draft approach for a refactor that would allow users to skip some of the overhead optionally: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/digest/pull/220 - would appreciate some feedback there about those outlines before pursuing further.

In the broken up version of #220 - next step is #222. Pending feedback, this is essentially encapsulating all the algorithms. The next would be to register all of them.