Carl A. B. Pearson
Carl A. B. Pearson
perhaps the order is actually systematic schema plan => implementation => spin off visualization. re the schema plan, thinking roughly a wide vs long format thing. iirc, what comes off...
> Sound of a broken record: I am still not a fan of macros. > > How about if you pick one algo you really like and want to use...
> I like the last commit a lot better. > > BTW, and I just want to float this here for discussion, I have of course a preference for C++...
 quick look w/ microbenchmark - the direct version for equivalent asks is substantially faster. I'm not exactly sure how to capture these methods in testing, so...
> (Maybe better than a screenshot is a simple `autoplot(res)` (or whatever the handy microbenchmark result plotter is called).) agree - was lazily trying to just leverage how i'm trying...
Alright, seems like we agree this is basically in the right direction. What needs doing on *this* PR? I'd like to add tests confirming proper handling of the types that...
> I had a quick look at what I do in RcppRedis, and it is basically just one header add to its src/Redis.cpp (and LinkingTo in DESCRIPTION) and then basically...
> Made a minor cleanup. Now > > ```shell > $ Rscript -e 'library(digest); jenny
> I think so too as it is a branch with a PR into my repo so AFAIUI github lets me. [ Commits, pushes. ] And it does. > >...
> We are having side-effects. I filed a (in hindsight: non-) bug report as `digest::digest` misbehaved: [HenrikBengtsson/future#740](https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/future/issues/740) > > Call that another vote for leaving `digest` alone and trying the...