Old Dip Tracker
Old Dip Tracker
> and perhaps add the macOS check to be safe in not trying to doubly declare things I just upgraded my macOS to 26 and with boost 1.89 (didn't test...
> de_AT, de_CH & de_GER are pretty much the same in formally written language. de_DE !!! 😂 See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2
Sorry ser I identify as Rolex (de, CH)
rebased after #3715
We could definitely add a check process that ensures the integrity of the subtrees, perhaps in a similar way to [the scripted commit checker](https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/master/contrib/devtools/commit-script-check.sh). Edit: we actually [have the script](https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/a6d12201363b0eb4ccf854b609fc6e98958b1443/contrib/devtools/git-subtree-check.sh),...
3 notes: - you need to add remotes to be able to check the commits - `qa/rpc-tests/python-bitcoinrpc` has been transformed into the test framework, so this is no longer valid...
> To clarify, you are proposing making master branch more of a "rolling" branch, yes? Yes. About 10 years ago, we changed it from that, to accommodate full back ports...
> My only concern is that this adds some maintenance burden to cherry-pick into a hypothetical 1.14.8 and 1.15.0 simultaneously. If we now merge 1.15.0-dev into master, it means that...
> branch off a 1.14.8 release and prepare and fixate it there, then merge back anything essential into the main branch. Minor correction: we branch off a 1.14.8 and then...
I've added a warning to the top of the document.