Old Dip Tracker
Old Dip Tracker
shasums from lxc gitian: ``` 36954c6c21188cd214df174148b2bb10e38dac5247d517f6cf596f031ad564b9 dogecoin-1.14.7-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 942a460bca90fa5641af8b89eeb2dbf1aaa7756a50e0a41176448fee9034bb34 dogecoin-1.14.7-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 62fa11d527184b6a0ccd3e21fe8cbd48b000d2c851593de4c409fcf4628c6381 dogecoin-1.14.7-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz 7b17cd66e0cedcb35ca1dd3781481cad3ce8eabefb9137f088876d68fcc0322f dogecoin-1.14.7-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz da36a7c8ecb32f14268a83999f33536ae01ff6de3f1e55167d79f855ec7d02a1 dogecoin-1.14.7-i686-pc-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz 826e821678cc538f1fb134c1ea03dc1fdd9526ac229e8c6b0e479c79a6f26dbf dogecoin-1.14.7-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz 926ebc63d08f502462f36f9a8b3e59954c362fdb29f20ce5a20f3d60e67b495a dogecoin-1.14.7-osx-unsigned.dmg 1d7dabb22f642558bd742c9198688b54a9848436975eb3537257b4f763510661 dogecoin-1.14.7-osx-unsigned.tar.gz c754904d0c2bbd79904a799baa00fdef8ccadd24a56070fc3e7ddaa304cd40ab dogecoin-1.14.7-osx64.tar.gz 85c7309fd2dd7598bbed8347b2f11145ced710dcb3701a63a8f2785c83a4a306 dogecoin-1.14.7-win-unsigned.tar.gz 36f90aba873d62f491e1b91481500ee8d0d357e6614856e1b92e70f5f26ca53d dogecoin-1.14.7-win32-debug.zip ca83a9df8f78a924bf173b6db162febc252239c8e785ae5e345bb14528bd1790 dogecoin-1.14.7-win32-setup-unsigned.exe 1cf68b3bad215352e4a0f50eab6e798fe6535ca1b3a39e647e4214566b30ca32...
#3454 is another example of this being useful - running iwyu over `src/bench` solved an issue that is (likely) caused by a boost 1.84 header no longer including ``
> Great! Is there a way to flag this to discussion #3471 ? It's not related, this affects the depends system only
Gitian match between @edtubbs's docker run and my lxc run ✅ I'll do one last run through the source diff then this should be good to go.
Before we spend a lot of time on reviews, what's the benefit of having both pt-PT and pt-BR? Can we choose one that everyone understands?
I'm sure it's relevant in the context of ice cream, hospitals and sandwiches, but what about Dogecoin Core. Is the current pt-BR translation such an atrocity to a large amount...
I don't think this repository should be a place to host nationalism. If adding the Brazilian translation is deemed offensive by the 10M people from Portugal then perhaps we made...
We'll have a solution for this with the next release.
I've written a problem statement and proposal to fix re: those readme files in #3436
Please rework this to the structure introduced by #3459, so that this can go in.