nothingismagick

Please see the issue that @zserge linked above. I think that a webview org as an umbrella would be much better than a collection of disparate orgs.

At the risk of repeating myself, I love this idea - and here are a couple thoughts about how the org could be structured: 1. At the top a "governance"...

Well, I think with a little bit of an organizational push at the beginning - with minimal structure, shared vision and openness for growth - a lot of my personal...

Well, at tauri we are pretty happy with the GH Actions matrix. We are building not only our libs - but also a number of smoketests to validate that everything...

Sorry, what this means is e.g. location or webcam

Reading through the code - there is the outdated option to use a custom version of webview, but this [commit](https://github.com/Boscop/web-view/commit/f9bf450eefc5b4eb5b8e486a670ccd12c5f2da78#diff-71f0c27f875695ce0a376370888c3388) makes the following statement in the comment impossible: ``` //!...

And maybe @zserge would like to tell us if that is even a good idea :)

We were discussing this internally this afternoon, and we could also envision providing bindings for python, go, nim et. al. from the rust core. Not having to include C in...

Well, we could maybe convince him to split the header like we've done... >

Something we are currently working on at tauri is enabling you to sideload other binaries (bundled in the monolith) which then can communicate with rust and the WebView by proxy....