Nikos Baxevanis

>What do you think? Can't we call the failing test(s) with `fableIgnore` so they're ignored from the JS test-runner?

> Can't we call the failing test(s) with `fableIgnore` so they're ignored from the JS test-runner? @ThisFunctionalTom, wouldn't this be an accepted solution?

Thank you, @dcastro :rocket: Let's do the `within` one first, if you wish :eyes: — On the others, for example, the tuples are trivial, so perhaps not really worth the...

@dcastro > so far we have `total`, `evalNF` and `nf` on the table, do any of these sound reasonable? Perhaps we should stick with the QC terminology for this one...

>@moodmosaic Let's go with `total` then :) I discussed about this with @jacobstanley a few times now (naming can be so hard!)—`evalNF` (your first suggestion) would be better because it...

@dcastro, on `imply`/`==>`, have you tried [`guard`](https://github.com/hedgehogqa/haskell-hedgehog/blob/9c2da54aebbd3cac73c26f3acdbda748d5bf10c0/hedgehog-example/src/Test/Example/Basic.hs#L71)?

@newhoggy, great :+1: Feel free to paste an example here, if that's easy for you, for anyone else that might be looking into this in the future.

Even with a mapping between Hedgehog and FsCheck `Gen` combinators, the two libraries work in a different way, so I don't think it's worth spending time on this. In Hedgehog,...

Yes, it's the one for the Haskell version of Hedgehog. It was actually [released today](https://github.com/hedgehogqa/haskell-hedgehog/pull/103) 😃

We probably need to close #89 first before doing something similar in the F# version.