Marija Najdova

> Are we settling on dropping the use of the GitHub discussions for RFCs? > Or would it work if GitHub discussions are reserved for RFCs we expect a LOT...

```jsx ``` This looks most intuitive API to me. And, in addition, we can also support it with the `components` API: ```jsx

> Anyway, I can make this work with a hack on TSS side so, no worries, feel free to close. Let's try to go with this first. > As always,...

Agree, the demo should be updated. cc @michaldudak can you check this out?

> @mnajdova is this good to be merged now? Let's wait for rebase and revert the change of the version in @mui/styles again. After that should be good to go.

Thanks for creating the issue. Let's use it as a stub 👌

> Hi, if nobody wants to take up this task, I can plan and gradually migrate some mui components to material v3 standards. @mnajdova, is there anything blocking that needs...

@NawarA we use the @mui/material-next package for experiments, you can find the source code in https://github.com/mui/material-ui/tree/master/packages/mui-material-next Then people who are interested to try it, can give it a go.

@michaldudak I don't think the problem is with the order of how things are defined, but how this variant is defined. In the demo that you linked, if you change...

Overall looks good. Few things that probably could be improved. 1. Should we by default add all imports valid from the @mui packages in the scope? Will this affect perf?...