Mateusz Łoskot

You're free to do anything the licence allows you to do. GIL already can use C++14, see https://github.com/boostorg/gil/pull/526#issuecomment-724540995 Yes, we prefer `using` aliases over `typedef` for aliases. ------ By the...

Awesome, thanks!

@meshtag They seem to be using Boost.Test while in GIL we use Boost.LightweightText Although developing more/new cases on your/our own is certainly a good idea - the more tests the...

Right, but the #87 one offers customised configuration. I was mostly interested to know how different is this one from the #87 I have not had a chance to try...

Do you know if there is any way to tell `clang-format` to respect custom macro like `BOOST_FORCEINLINE` as `inline`? Currently, this: ```cpp BOOST_FORCEINLINE int foo() { return 1 + 2;...

Do you know if there is any way in clang-format 12 to handle the trailing return better way? Here is one bit from `algorithm.hpp` which I manually formatted long time...

I think this would also be an opportunity to refactor functions into trailing return type. For example, this input ```cpp template inline typename type_from_x_iterator::view_t planar_cmyk_view(std::size_t width, std::size_t height, IC c,...

I understand clang 12 is not yet widely available via popular distro packages, but I think we should start using clang-format from the latest release, and keep ourselves updated as...

I have another example and question: I run the `clang-format` against header from the PR https://github.com/boostorg/gil/pull/604 and wonder if this alignment of `=` assignments is intentional? ```cpp for (std::ptrdiff_t i...

Replying to my own https://github.com/boostorg/gil/pull/596#issuecomment-822677161 > Do you know if there is any way in clang-format 12 to handle the trailing return better way? There is a way! https://stackoverflow.com/a/60471935/151641 which,...