Mateusz Łoskot

Certainly, there is GIS influence observable in BG (e.g. in terms of what kind of algorithms are offered first, what are missing), but to me it is suitable as general...

@yuxianch Pull requests are always welcome

@awulkiew In https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/issues/664#issuecomment-583736980 you suggested > we'd need a separate function for that. What did you have in mind? This PR seems to follow my suggestion I made in https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/issues/664#issuecomment-583773745...

@Siddharth-coder13 No, for now it does not, but we need to wait and clarify my question https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/pull/782#issuecomment-743275433 in order to confirm this is actually the kind of change we need...

@Siddharth-coder13 Please, see https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/pull/789#issuecomment-777841388

@tonyelewis Thanks for the report. Apparently, more headers need attention than just this one, see #525

Does `variant=debug` vs `variant=release` make a difference?

I started brainstorming use of plotly (or others) for general shapes drawing, see https://gitter.im/boostorg/geometry?at=5e6d0b8e17d3e742347c5346 Since plotly can draw geometric shapes, https://plotly.com/python/shapes/, as well as can draw on top of popular...

@awulkiew > Why not use widely known solution for that (at least according to my limited knowledge of the subject), i.e. GeoJSON? Aside from displaying on maps it would allow...

Moving this to milestone 1.76