Thomas BERNARD

As far as I understand, the IGD standard doesn't support NAT66. I think you should have a look at PCP (RFC6887). How to use PCP in a NAT66 scenario is...

Any extension to the existing UPnP specification is doomed to fail due to the wish of a major actor : https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1840

@motohiko-sato If you develop the reference implementation of you extension specification proposed to OCF into miniupnpd, I will integrate it. As long as the extension is not official specification, we...

miniupnpd was first developped for pf and use the pf rule "label" which is limited to 64 bytes to store the description.

In fact the limit should be removed from miniupnpc (API needs to be changed) but miniupnpd is limited to 64 chars

83ac78c55af6d27c6e19a6e0de46da2d525d1a2d allow arbitrary long description in miniupnpc

you've got it : "unused" means "with no traffic". This feature is useful with IGDv1 control points that don't set any lease duration on port mappings. It is useless when...

there is more work that I initially thought, because `get_upnp_rules_state_list` also cleans the expired port mappings.

> > there is more work that I initially thought, because `get_upnp_rules_state_list` also cleans the expired port mappings. > > And now, do you fix the code that didn't work...

You are the only one who does not understand the documentation. You are not "my community".