Michael Camara Pendon

We have made a fix for an almost identical scenario via this request (https://github.com/mikependon/RepoDB/issues/963) and that affects this use-case. The main reason of change was because of RepoDB's poor column...

> If that will move the error outside of SQL Server, then it will pass the test. We can do revert this behavior again with more strict validation against the...

Related: https://github.com/mikependon/RepoDB/issues/1036

This will be available in the releases > RepoDB v1.12.10.

@jgranger36 - by design, RepoDB's does not have State Tracking functionalities and could not track any changes made to the data/row. With this, the possibility of updating only which data/row...

Relating: https://github.com/mikependon/RepoDb/issues/338

Somebody place this issue on our RepoDB.NET site. Referencing: https://github.com/mikependon/RepoDB.NET/issues/41

Yes, this is not triggered on the Bulk Operations yet (both SQL Server and PostgreSQL). This is on our timeline.

This is the right place, the other repo is for the documentation site.

Thanks for reporting. It is a simple fix though. We are glad if you can also make a PR of this, otherwise we will do the fix and it will...