Michael Donaldson

I'm using it with Ember / EmberCLI 2.18.0 without issue, albeit via prember/fastboot. Not sure if you're also using `ember-cli-head` or not, but if so, upgrading from v0.3.x to v0.4.x...

Is it known what work is required to get this working? Currently I think this issue is preventing the add-on from working correctly when used with [ember-cli-staticboot](https://github.com/robwebdev/ember-cli-staticboot) with the `includeClientScripts`...

We had considered extracting the core set of components out into separate add-ons previously but decided against the idea after further thought. Pulling components from the parent application would allow...

> would ^x.y.z in your package.json do the trick for this part? Unfortunately not as this would still require add-on authors to re-build the engine and re-package their add-on whenever...

I wouldn't mind taking a stab at drafting an RFC for this if someone else wouldn't mind reviewing it before submission. Does anyone have any other particular points/concerns that they...

@devinus It's not necessarily difficult, a decision just needs to be made whether to allow this functionality or not. I'm hoping to publish an RFC in the next week or...

@devinus I agree but I think there are concerns that the more things we allow to become dependencies, the more we begin to break down the boundaries created by engines....

Archiving this conversation on Slack with @nathanhammond and @cibernox for future reading. > cibernox: I think it's very common to have, say, ember-wormhole in your app > and it's used...

I believe if you need routes you should be using a routable engine and not a route-less engine.

I believe #569 may have caused the shoebox data to be stripped from the page. Reason being that if you look at the page source that was actually returned from...