Matt Johnson-Pint

Is there any way an internal validation check could be added to `dotnet workload install/update` commands such that the previous version of a workload would continue to be used until...

With regard to potentially more than one concurrent transaction, only the first would be set on the scope. Also, with regard to #2066 - we should not be setting transactions...

Agree with Simon. This isn't something we can easily support in the SDK. It would also deviate heavily from Sentry's SDKs for other platforms. I suggest you explore tagging as...

@SeanFeldman - we should do a package similar to the one you did for Azure Functions in #2346 Please also take a look at #1825 - which I was unable...

This would make a great community contribution.

@Pretasoc - If you wouldn't mind a draft PR on this, that would be great. Thanks!

I did some debugging. The issue is that the breadcrumbs are stored with the current logging scope, and are lost after that scope is disposed. Methods like `HttpClient.GetStringAsync` create their...

This won't be a simple fix, as it would require some changes that would significantly change the current behavior. As documented [here](https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/dotnet/guides/extensions-logging/enriching-events/scopes/) (emphasis mine): > The scope will hold useful...

Note also that this issue doesn't occur if you enable [Global Mode](https://forum.sentry.io/t/accessing-and-ensuring-global-shared-scope-in-net/11709/9). You can turn it on with this: ```csharp logging.AddSentry(options => { options.IsGlobalModeEnabled = true; }) ``` or in...

We're considering adding a boolean option to opt-out of binding the logging scope to the Sentry scope. That would prevent a breaking change (off by default), but give the option...