Matt Gebert

In case it wasn't clear, `GL08` has the description "The object does not have a docstring".

Hey all (@larsoner, @stefanv), I have re-opened the issue as the current implementation is not working with the `AstValidator`. It is my understanding that the `AstValidator` is the preferred validator...

Further discussion on this, should all tests in test_validate also be written/run with AstValidator in mind?

@stefanv Is it just me or are we not properly testing hook validation at all? I [searched the `run test suite` CI](https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/actions/runs/12712334114/job/35437682050) for references to `hook` (i.e. [`numpydoc/tests/hooks/test_validate_hook.py`](https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/blob/main/numpydoc/tests/hooks/test_validate_hook.py)) but I...

Sorry it's been a while. I've added (#622) a fix and updated test to ensure the AST Validation functionality is also checked. > We should probably re-introduce the --pre flag...

@larsoner Thanks mate. I've figure that out now. I think the implementation is succinct. I currently don't have any projects with a sphinx production (in the process of setting up...

Whilst not directly related, I also notice that while the ability to track decorator functions has been added a while ago, specific support for the `property` decorator and it's subsequent...

Also noticed [this pull request](https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/pull/601) related to long running issue [#196](https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/issues/196) which touches on the use of type hinting to avoid requiring numpydoc to specify the type hinting with redundancy....