Michael Mayer

Yes, we could also make the comparison stricter (reduce the radius) so that less faces match to these embeddings: https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism/blob/develop/internal/face/children.go#L4 I've added them because the results for those were unusable...

The model either has a blind spot there or not. It's not something you can configure away, that's why this issue exists. I suspect the radius was chosen too large...

Changed the matching radius in our Development Preview. Will be part of the next update.

@rickysarraf Does `photoprism config` work for you?

Did you test our latest Development Preview?

see https://docs.photoprism.org/release-notes/#development-preview

Before we add yet another config parameter (check how many we have already), it would be awesome to debug your issue using example files. We won't share them and delete...

Since we didn't receive any test files so far, we continue with try & error. Radius has been further reduced. If the issue still persists it might be something else...

Can you provide us with free to use pictures for development, demo and testing?

Thanks! How did you create them? Are there common apps for this?