Lars Hupel

A Bachelor's student at TUM is working on this.

I have a bit time at my hands. Would you be interested in me sending a PR porting to ScalaTest 3.2? (I think this is a good idea regardless of...

> The thing with scalatest is that (at least it used to be the case that) dependencies have to be updated twitter-wide, so it's broader than just this repo. Yeah,...

There still appears to be some problem here. In [better-files](https://scaladex.scala-lang.org/pathikrit/better-files), there is one dependent listed, but when I click on "Artifact Dependents", I get a completely different result.

I worked around it (for now) by moving the comments into the function body.

I ended up doing this as a workaround: typelevel/cats-mtl@1e89758b505ad7f39b4421f15041bad201e53d27

I think migrating everyone to mdoc in time is infeasible. A thorough investigation would be highly appreciated.

Also, I just realized that code in indented fenced blocks doesn't get trimmed, which means the output will look like this: ```scala scala> Set(1, 2).toList == Set(2, 1).toList res0: Boolean...

> I can hang onto the indentation and delete that number of leading spaces from any interior lines I find, but I don't think it's worth trying to re-implement whatever...

Of course; I'm not arguing that `JSAgent` should be exposed just like that. The article you linked isn't applicable in my scenario. The application is started through `node`, which means...