Λlisue

Ok, I'll check the behavior

Hum... If you don't need the inspection steps, why don't you use [django-registration](https://github.com/macropin/django-registration) with BASIC auth on the registration page or so on? I don't really get your situation...

Hum...the library wasn't built for that kind of usage thus you need to implement your own code to do that. this library send a signal like https://django-inspectional-registration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq.html#i-want-to-use-django-inspectional-registration-but-i-don-t-need-inspection-step so you may...

you prob. need to inherit the default backend to custamize the behaviour while default one is just for a simple 5 step registration. i'm sure that you can get what...

Several pattern to annotate fields as `?` or `readonly`. ```typescript import { is, Predicate } from "./mod.ts"; function optional(name: K): K { return name; } function readonly(name: K): K {...

What I'm thinking of it is - `as.Optional` - Optional for a field or an element - `as.Readonly` - Readonly for a field or an element - `is.PartialOf` - Optional...

I've added example project. How could I reproduce the error with that?

`RegistrationView` use [`get_form_class()`](https://github.com/lambdalisue/django-inspectional-registration/blob/master/src/registration/views.py#L144) method to get the registration form class, not `form_class` attribute. That's why overriding `form_class` didn't work. In the method, `self.backend.get_registraion_form_class()` is called and [the method in a...

`registration.supplements.base.RegistrationSupplementBase`, which must be inherited to use supplement feature, have [`get_form_class`](https://github.com/lambdalisue/django-inspectional-registration/blob/master/src/registration/supplements/base.py#L65) class method which return `form_class` attribute of the class. So ``` class MyRegistrationSupplement(RegistrationSupplementBase): form_class = MyRegistrationSupplementForm ``` should work....

ping @danmir